🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been closely studied by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities blocked the sale of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the authorities pays for the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and social skills indicate they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker discovered personally.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and unique traits in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.

“One whale chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I understand relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales progressed against a context of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her time at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not open to the guests over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Structural materials is breaking off from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not respond to a request for comment, but previously claimed: “The whales … get far better veterinary services and constant care than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility believed particulars of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for demands for the whales to be taken immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing existence in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience permit an transfer that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the minister’s statements reflect a wider lack of awareness of the circumstances of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials work to find a answer, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has proven highly debated. The future facility, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term answer for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the idea of a refuge represents a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a viable plan in the near future.

Charles Vinick, head of the plan, said the facility will replicate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|